<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Referer Stats for ObsoleteSkills.com</title>
	<atom:link href="http://pantsland.com/2008/03/12/referer-stats-for-obsoleteskillscom/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://pantsland.com/2008/03/12/referer-stats-for-obsoleteskillscom/</link>
	<description>Brad Kellett Blogs the Web, Mobile Tech, and...</description>
	<pubDate>Tue, 07 Oct 2008 03:32:19 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.2</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Stilgherrian</title>
		<link>http://pantsland.com/2008/03/12/referer-stats-for-obsoleteskillscom/#comment-24837</link>
		<dc:creator>Stilgherrian</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 Mar 2008 02:19:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://pantsland.com/2008/03/12/referer-stats-for-obsoleteskillscom/#comment-24837</guid>
		<description>Stumbleupon is &lt;em&gt;specifically&lt;/em&gt; about "Hey, look at this!" so it'll generate click-throughs. Slashdot has the rabid geeks who'll compete to post obscure tech from their teen years. Together they create lotsa traffic.

BoingBoing is widely read, but covers a huge range of interests. They tell much of the story in their post. Less likely to generate click-throughs because only a proportion are interested in that specific story, and only a proportion of those want any more than what's in the summary.

David Pogue's blog is attached to a major MSM outlet. Plenty of traffic, perhaps, but a demographic that's more passive in its media consumption. I've certainly noticed that TechCrunch delivers more traffic than, say, a mention by a News Corp blogger.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stumbleupon is <em>specifically</em> about &#8220;Hey, look at this!&#8221; so it&#8217;ll generate click-throughs. Slashdot has the rabid geeks who&#8217;ll compete to post obscure tech from their teen years. Together they create lotsa traffic.</p>
<p>BoingBoing is widely read, but covers a huge range of interests. They tell much of the story in their post. Less likely to generate click-throughs because only a proportion are interested in that specific story, and only a proportion of those want any more than what&#8217;s in the summary.</p>
<p>David Pogue&#8217;s blog is attached to a major MSM outlet. Plenty of traffic, perhaps, but a demographic that&#8217;s more passive in its media consumption. I&#8217;ve certainly noticed that TechCrunch delivers more traffic than, say, a mention by a News Corp blogger.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
